Regarding civil rights records of the two main parties, morality is a guiding motivator when choosing sides. Do you agree with the following statement?

I am a Democrat because:

1. The Republicans fought against anti-lynching  legislation.

2. The Democratic Party was formed to end slavery.

3. The Republicans started the KKK to intimidate minorities and democrat voters.

4. The Republican Party fought hard against anti-segregation legislation.

5. Republicans supported a eugenics plan to get rid of “undesirables” in poor and minority neighborhoods.

The problem with the above enumerated statements is that they are attributing actions to the wrong party. It was the democrats that fought hard against civil rights and used the KKK as their enforcement arm to intimidate republican voters and minorities through beatings and lynchings.

Now for the question of the century: Why are the majority of minorities democrat? Were they willing to trade one form of enslavement with another and forgive the party that fought against their freedom so ruthlessly? Could it be that if you re-framed the statements above as questions such as “Which party fought against anti-lynching legislation?”, you would be surprised at the answer?

I did exactly that when I asked these questions during a college Sociology course and found it very disturbing that the majority of my fellow students thought that the democratic party was responsible for all laws that ended segregation, anti-lynching, and was formed to end slavery. Some were so disturbed by the correct answers that they accused me of racism and trying to re-write history although I cited nothing but documented legislative records and peer-reviewed articles regarding the link between the KKK and the democratic party.

The democratic party is an insidiously evil and deceptive party. They support Planned Parenthood and have successfully convinced the poor and minorities that it is their right to abort. This is exactly what the famous racist and eugenicist Margaret Sanger hoped for when she created Planned Parenthood. She was able to spin (lie) her cause into a rallying cry for women’s rights. If you look at where the vast majority of Planned Parenthood clinics are located, you will see that they are in poor and minority neighborhoods. Sanger was more effective than Hitler in that she has the “undesirables”  flocking to her clinics willingly! Now that is a master stroke of evil genius!

Again, you will see that it is the republican right that is pro-life and the democrats that are mainly pro-choice. The term pro-choice is such an elegant and heroic misnomer for what is actually murder. All the while the poor and minorities are happily trotting down to the clinic to exercise their right to abort and being told that they should feel proud for exercising their right as an empowered woman!

The democratic party has done more to enslave and murder the poor and minorities than any other party in the history of the United States, yet the republicans are the ones that are demonized and held accountable and called the racists. Are the poor and minorities so uninformed and lacking in education that they believe the liars even when historical documentation proves otherwise? One thing is for sure:  The democrats know the value of keeping the poor uneducated and dependent on the government. The moment that they actually seek out and see the truth for themselves the democratic party will die. I don’t see that happening due to the grip the democrats have on government entitlement programs and the mainstream media. Democrats can only exist in a society of enormous government entitlement programs to redistribute wealth to those who have not earned it. It is those that have not earned it that are primarily dependent on democrats to keep the flow of benefits going. It is through the brute force of the government that minorities will be kept enslaved by the government through entitlement programs that will replace any dignity they had with the belief that they are entitled to free money and benefits. It is this brute force of the government that is redistributing earned wealth to those that will never know what it’s like to earn anything.

As a free man, I will always earn my way and will never rely on the government to provide. Even though I paid in to social security and medicare, I do not expect to have these programs around for long after I retire. It is through my toil that I gain legitimacy and self respect. If you live on unearned entitlements and you are not handicapped, you have no excuse because you have either given up or been robbed of your self respect by a system that relies on your economic enslavement.

Democrats have evolved from a knowing conspiracy to actually believing their own BS. It was in the sixties that the lie began and now the offspring of the liars have come to hold the lie as the truth.

Think you can do better than congress? Try your hand at balancing the budget:

http://marketplace.publicradio.org/features/budget_hero/

Nice tech policy analysis:

http://techliberation.com/

I like the cut of this guy’s jib:

http://volokh.com/

Interesting Debates

Posted: July 19, 2011 in Recommended Links

Link to some very good debates:

http://intelligencesquaredus.org/index.php/past-debates/

story contributed by Melvin Spittle, Senior writer for the LA Times Social Justice desk

In an unprecedented move, the SEIU has successfully integrated over 4.5 million bomb-sniffing worker bees into the union. Although they will pay no dues initially, it is expected that newly initiated contract negotiations will ensure fair compensation for the nations bomb-sniffing worker bees. On the table for negotiation are wage scales for these highly trained and specialized worker bees, working hours, working conditions, health plan coverage, pensions & vacations.

The successful actions of animal rights attorneys regarding exploited animal workers paved the way for working animals to be recognized by our legal system as having much the same rights as their human counterparts.

Crowded working conditions of bomb-sniffing worker bees.

SEIU proposed "Three bees per office"

Bomb-sniffing worker bees at SEIU local 638 vote to strike if negotiations fall through.

Political Email: Volunteer Requests

I am launching my own campaign. I keep getting all the DNC campaign emails (I am a conservative) and now found a novel use for their volunteer requests:

1. Show up for the neighborhood canvasing event and volunteer to cover the largest area.

2. Eat the free lunch.

3. Depart to the canvas area but stop by a trashcan and dump all the material.

4. Go to sports bar, watch the game & drink brew.

5. Report back to the event and claim my signatures were stolen by gang members for “trespassing in their hood”.

6. Eat free dinner and sign up for next event.

So did Palestine EVER exist? I linked to an article by Japanese writer Yashiko Sagamori below that presents an excellent argument that questions and evaluates the very basis for the pro-Palestine movement’s claim for a Palestinian state. I do not think historical fact will do any good whatsoever as the pro-Palestine movement here in the US and internationally are emotion-based. Critical thinkers evaluate facts and understand that emotion will blind you. Take CodePink and Barrack Obama for example. Their lack of historical knowledge of the middle east is astounding but understandable because their argument is based on emotional feelings rather than historical fact. We can’t have facts getting in the way of emotional rage, now can we?

Link: Questions to ask Pro-Palestine Windbags

Here is an excerpt from the article that questions Palestine ever existing:

***********************************************************

  1. When was it founded and by whom?
  2. What were its borders?
  3. What was its capital?
  4. What were its major cities?
  5. What constituted the basis of its economy?
  6. What was its form of government?
  7. Can you name at least one Palestinian leader before Arafat?
  8. Was Palestine ever recognized by a country whose existence, at that time or now, leaves no room for interpretation?
  9. What was the language of the country of Palestine ?
  10. What was the prevalent religion of the country of Palestine ?
  11. What was the name of its currency? Choose any date in history and tell what was the approximate exchange rate of the Palestinian monetary unit against the US dollar, German mark, GB pound, Japanese yen, or Chinese yuan on that date.
  12. And, finally, since there is no such country today, what caused its demise and when did it occur?

You are lamenting the “low sinking” of a “once proud” nation. Please tell me, when exactly was that “nation” proud and what was it so proud of?

***********************************************************

So where the hell do these batshit crazy pro-Palestine loons come from?

Our public schools and universities from grades K to college professor are infected by pro-Palestine / anti-Israel propaganda. I indict the public education propaganda machine that no longer educates, but indoctrinates our children and young adults. Academia is infected with tenured professors that live in the rarefied  vacuum of emotional theory and intellectual masturbation. Gone are the days of open debate based on argument that is supported by logical fact and perspective. What has replaced critical thinking is emotional feeling and sense of social and global justice where logical fallacies do not exist. To present facts that are contrary to the accepted group think of college campuses is to be charged with racism, hate-speech, intolerance etc.. Fortunately, history has proved time and time again, that activism is not a skill that most employers are looking for. Beyond the walls of academia is this inconvenient thing called reality.

Remember, logic and coherency are enemies of the leftist pro-Palestine debate: Emotional rage and amplitude are their friends. Can anyone present a coherent and logical pro-Palestine argument? I really want to hear it.

Exercise for activists:

Honestly ask yourselves:

Are there logical fallacies in my argument?                                                                                                     Yes: -1 No: +1

Are the key facts well supported by primary source data?                                                                       Yes: +1 No: -1

Do the key facts support the foundation of  my argument?                                                                        Yes +1 No: -1

Have you taken the devils advocate position to evaluate the strength of your argument?         Yes: +1 No: -1

Am I ignoring facts that may erode my argument by stacking the deck of facts that do?             Yes: -1 No: +1

If you score a perfect 5, why do you feel the need to shout when your argument is solid?

If you score anything other than a 5, you can compensate for the weakness of your argument with a little amplitude.

If you score a -5, might I suggest fifty people with megaphones to drown out the voice of dissent?

I know that the honesty part will be entirely impossible for some, such as CodePink for example. This only works if you really want to get as close to the truth as possible.

What could be a possible unintended consequence of a total handgun ban in the US? Criminals would just resort to the next best tool: The knife. In the UK, that is exactly what has happened. Now knife related crime is epidemic and the UK is approaching the issue aggressively, but short of a a ban on all knives. Although they did try to ban sharp pointy knives, allowing only rounded knives, such as a butter knife. Pointed steak knives would have been banned under this proposal. The bottom line is that humans will always find a way to do each other in or use any common object as leverage to threaten a victims life.  Below is a link to the story and another to the program overview of a tactic to reduce knife related crime. Did it work? Of course not. The data concluded there was no statistically significant change in knife related crime after over $20 million was spent on the program even though they can search and seize at random and without probable cause. The citizens of the UK will always be an infinite source of victims for their criminal element until they recognize the right of citizens to defend themselves with reliable means.

Telegraph story:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8533735/Knife-action-programme-made-no-difference-says-report.html

Link to program overview:

http://publicpolicyexchange.co.uk/docs/8J30-PPE_3_Helen_Kynaston.pdf

I had a nightmare and it went a little something like this:

Home-Defenders Convinced They Are Not Breaking The Law?

By Melvin P. Spittle

Senior staff writer, LA Times Social Justice Desk

May 1, 2134 Weekly Commentary

A trend is developing regarding home-defenders showing up for arraignment convinced that they have not broken any laws because the laws are supposedly “flawed in the first place” based on their “expanded” definition of the scope of home defense as outlined in the California Code of Criminal Rights CCCR Sec IIIa (1) “Limits on Home Defense”. Although their logic is obviously flawed, they insist on their innocence and many of their lawyers and some prosecutors agree: This is a very volatile gray area of the law, subject to radical swings between home-defense and criminal worker rights. And of course, we have to listen to their incessant blathering regarding 2nd Amendment rights being violated. When will they learn that reasonable limits to 2A rights do not burden the exercise thereof as outlined in the above section of the CCCR? Due to the aggressive nature of Home-Defenders and their violent rhetoric and hate-speech aimed at criminal workers, the California Attorney General’s office has advised all county District Attorneys to take a zero tolerance stance when prosecuting these particular types of home defense crimes.

It is this writers sage advice to the Home-Defender movement that one not mess with interpretation of laws that one does not understand, resulting in a justified charge for a home defense crime. Err on the side of reason and think of the impact your actions will have on your family. Home defense does not give one license to over zealously protect one’s “Castle” with unreasonable force resulting in the death or serious injury of a criminal worker. Remember that one’s ”Castle” is the criminal worker’s workplace and the individual crime worker has a right to the reasonable expectation of safety from illegal harassment, injury or death.  Where is your sense of social justice? Here is a little reminder: Tic-Toc, your Home Defender movement will soon be outlawed once popular legislation has passed this summer to add your extremist  movement to the California Domestic Terrorist Act list. Just sayin,…..

In the interim, citizens are being advised to keep handy their copies of the California Code of Criminal Rights as required by existing law so that they may advise a criminal that has broken into their home that he or she may be breaking the law and they are officially filing a grievance covered in the criminal worker’s union contract as negotiated by California’s largest criminal worker union, the California Urban Intrastate Freedom Fighters United (CUIFFU). Although there is no evidence of the law being effective for victims, citizens are warned not to antagonize or provoke the criminal worker or violate their California rights through armed self defense without first negotiating with the criminal as this may result in devastating civil litigation and mandatory criminal home defense charges. California law states that “ home defender-criminal worker” negotiations must first be attempted before escalation, ensuring a safe workplace for criminal workers in the home invasion robbery trade, one of the unions most dangerous occupational environments. Be warned that deliberate verbal provocation  of criminal workers is a violation of workplace harassment laws and has been used as a successful defense for criminal workers in the past to justify self preservation methods.

Social Justice moved forward when California home defense won a huge victory after criminal workers agreed not to break into the occupied residential dwellings/workplace  and must make an attempt to ensure the residence is unoccupied before entering their workplace.  Although if after due diligence the criminal finds his workplace occupied, he is obligated to first negotiate with the resident(s) and allow safe passage of residents if he or she is not provoked or antagonized before resorting to self preservation methods. This revision to the California Code of Criminal Rights has resulted in a safer working environment for the state’s criminal worker trades. As a result state representatives are happy to announce that although criminal worker trades are experiencing historical growth, workplace fatalities are down by over 82% this year alone compared to a 34% rise in home-defender fatalities. A 34% rise in home-defender fatalities may seem alarming to some, but upon closer scrutiny we see the majority of home-defender fatalities accounted for in this rise were due to direct violations of criminal rights and were ruled self-defense.  Citizens should be wary of the Home-Defender movement’s tactic of intentionally distorting this statistic to further their violent agenda.

Social justice has come a long way in the Peoples Socialist Republic of California. During the barbaric early years, criminal workers were not organized and were being indiscriminately murdered by overzealous members of the Home-Defender movement. Our first historic victory came when the state banned concentrations of pepper spray  over 10% strength and limited container size to 2.5 ounces. This law alone has resulted in a safe work environment for all of California’s sex crime workers. This went unchallenged in the courts and later paved the way for precedent setting legislation to reign in the Home-Defender extremists. Just two years later, the next huge win for social justice was the 9th Circuit Court’s finding that one may not use deadly force in one’s residence/crime-workers workplace, against a crime-worker unless one can prove that a reasonable man would feel their life was in danger. This would not have been possible without the early grass roots efforts of WACOSCW.org,  the Widows and Children of Slain Criminal Workers which has now evolved into the modern day CUIFFU. As originally envisioned, the CUIFFU’s efforts has drastically reduced prison populations, provided jobs in the fastest growing sector of the state economy, and has not cost the taxpayer a dime due to legal remedy through expanded access to civil courts for spouses, children  and relatives of criminal workers to seek damages from Home-Defender’s criminal conduct during the armed commission of a home defense felony that results in the serious injury or death of a criminal worker.

Fellow citizens, we have made great progress but still have a long way to go and criminal worker rights is just one of many goals yet to be fully achieved before we can claim victory for social justice.

Home-Defender movement member’s threatening outburst

Is typical of this extremist movements violent, classist membership.

This unnamed member threatened criminal workers outside

of the CUIFFU Local 187 union hall in Compton, CA stating,

“why should I negotiate with a criminal in my own home? Not me.

Not ever. I’ll shoot’ em, you can bet that!”

Related Stories:

California Rights Lottery Results are In!

Five-time felon John Ellison hits the California Rights lottery by successfully suing his excessively wealthy home defenders, Daniel and Sarah Patterson of Pasadena, when he was shot attempting to abduct their 7 year old daughter during a home invasion last year. John “Pedo-Bear” Ellison was awarded 2.9 million dollars in damages as the latest winner.  Mr. Ellison suffers severe PTSD and left ear permanently scarred by a grazing bullet fired by Patterson in a fit of vicious rage resulting in the jury deliberating for only three minutes. Asked what was the key to his winning, Ellison stated “fifth time’s a charm motherf****rs! My gun jammed and the motherf****r still shot me after I tol’em “timeout, my gun is mother****in’ jammed, mother f****r..””. California law is very specific and states clearly that valid timeouts for weapon malfunction are to be observed thanks to language negotiated by CUIFFU early last year. Currently, Patterson is out on bail and will face lesser charges due to a plea agreement to drop criminal charges against Mr. Ellison that would have resulted in a minimum of one to maximum of six month criminal misdemeanor sentence for Mr. Ellison. Patterson was  originally charged with attempted murder with a home-defense enhancement, a charge  that could have resulted in a total minimum sentence of twenty five years to  a maximum of life. Although Mr. Ellison has dropped all criminal charges, he has charitably offered to pay for Patterson’s defense for the state’s remaining felony charges of unlawful storage and discharge of a firearm, serious charges that may bring a minimum of two years in state prison for each count.

“How can the mother****r pay the judgment if he is in prison? He’s got kids ‘in stuff. See…I got a heart too you know! And it’s P-Bear, not Pedo-Bear! You all a bunch of a**holes!” Ellison remarked when asked about his charitable gesture to Patterson.

John “P-Bear” Ellison

is now $2.9 Million Richer!

If Patterson is victorious, he still faces six months of controversial in-patient AAT (Aggression Aversion Therapy) that is mandated for anyone charged with violent criminal firearms felonies unless a finding of factual innocence is determined. Patterson may be ordered to complete GAT (Greed Aversion Therapy) if during the preliminary investigation it is determined that his gross assets exceeds state personal wealth fairness guidelines.

Left: Patterson family reaction to Daniel Patterson’s initial charges of an armed home-defense crime.

Right: Patterson being quickly arrested at his workplace for his own safety.

Reported by Myron Finkbinder, AP

Paid Advertisement:

Want to know if there is a likely armed Home-Defender lurking before you break into your workplace? Download the “Gun-Alert” iPhone app at the Apple apps store!

Gun-Alert is brought to you by Work Safe, Inc., makers of the number one selling Pepper-Safe Tm safety goggles! We have partnered with CAL-OSHA and the CUIFFU to ensure a healthy and safe work place for crime workers! Gun-Alert works much the same as our popular LE only Domestic Terrorist Alert app!

Features:

Basic version:

  • Real-time data base of gun owners to include type and number of guns, just like the law enforcement version!
  • GPS Google Maps gun location overlay
  • Is the home I’m invading the residence of a fellow CUIFFU or law enforcement brother? No problem! CUIFFU and law enforcement union membership database overlay is standard in both versions! Avoiding costly mistakes and CUIFFU fines is easy with the intuitive and easy to read graphical interface!

Pro version includes basic version features and all of the following:

  • Home-Defender electronic gun safety over-ride: You can over-ride and lock all of the Home-Defender’s guns just like the Law Enforcement version!*
  • Pro App is available for all active CUIFFU members only!
  • Real-time GPS location overlay of all active law enforcement resources!
  • Law enforcement communications scanner to include encrypted tactical bands!
  • How many bullets do they have left? Gun-Alert knows!*
  • Eligible for CUIFFU plan health and life insurance rebates!
  • Live chat with other crime workers, ACLU and criminal law attorneys in your area!
  • Send an instant database update to alert all users and law enforcement of Home-Defenders that are using non-California legal firearms! Pass Go and collect your $200 illegal firearms bounty and join the ranks of the hundreds of crime workers that are making the state safe for all citizens!
  • Track your apprenticeship hours and experience on your road to Criminal Mastermind!
  • Track judgments awarded through the Crime Workers Compensation Act through text alerts of payments not received and easily chart judgment income!

Work-Safe, Inc, “ Your Partners In Crime Worker Safety!”

*Disclaimer: Only compatible with California legal guns. Illegal out of state guns are incompatible and may result in app reporting error.

And then I woke up……